Мощный удар Израиля по Ирану попал на видео09:41
Появились подробности о задержании основателя российского медиахолдингаСледователь МВД просит об аресте на 2 месяца основателя Readovka Костылева
，推荐阅读51吃瓜获取更多信息
智能涌现：所以你之前说拿到宇树订单的原因之一在于，FAM模型能通过小数据量样本，快速实现新任务学习，正是因为你们的技术方法比较节省数据？
Content-level diffs, three-way merge, and blame stay in libgit2 rather than being reimplemented in SQL, since libgit2 already has that support and works against the Postgres backends through cgo bindings. The Forgejo fork would be “replace modules/git with libgit2 backed by Postgres” rather than “replace modules/git with raw SQL,” because the read-side queries only cover the simple cases and anything involving content comparison or graph algorithms still needs libgit2 doing the work with Postgres as its storage layer. That’s a meaningful dependency to carry, though libgit2 is well-maintained and already used in production by the Rust ecosystem and various GUI clients. SQL implementations of some of this using recursive CTEs would be interesting to try eventually but aren’t needed to get a working forge. The remaining missing piece is the server-side pack protocol: the remote helper covers the client side, but a Forgejo integration also needs a server that speaks upload-pack and receive-pack against Postgres, either through libgit2’s transport layer or a Go implementation that queries the objects table directly.